🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager endured a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.